Re: [PATCH] remote-helpers: point at their upstream repositories
- From
Matthieu Moy <matthieu.moy@grenoble-inp.fr>
- Date
- May 18, 2014, 17:34 UTC
- Message-ID
- <vpqk39jous5.fsf@anie.imag.fr>
- In-Reply-To
- <5377994fe8dec_7a27d4b30438@nysa.notmuch>
Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com> writes:
Show 5 quoted lines
> % git fetch > WARNING: git-remote-hg is now maintained independently. > WARNING: For more information visit https://github.com/felipec/git-remote-hg > searching for changes > no changes found
I don't think the situation is as simple as you claim. In many cases, the first step before the ones you are mentionning are:
cd $git/contrib/remote-helpers
cp git-remote-{hg,bzr} somewhere/in/pathThey produces no warning if git-remote-{hg,bzr} exist with the warning, but "no such file or directory: contrib/remote-helpers" if the directory has been renamed or removed.
When git-remote-{hg,bzr} are installed with a package manager, the fact that they are part of Git's core or not is often irrelevant. For example, Debian splits the git.git source into many packages, so a Debian user will not see any difference between helpers included in git.git or outside (e.g. I have to install the package git-svn if I want to use git-svn).
That said, I'm fine with the "add a warning" option too.
-- Matthieu Moy http://www-verimag.imag.fr/~moy/