Re: [PATCHv2 2/2] t7512-status-warnings.sh: better advices for git status
- From
Matthieu Moy <matthieu.moy@grenoble-inp.fr>
- Date
- May 28, 2012, 08:43 UTC
- Message-ID
- <vpqaa0shf0s.fsf@bauges.imag.fr>
- In-Reply-To
- <1338035905-24166-2-git-send-email-Lucien.Kong@ensimag.imag.fr>
Kong Lucien <Lucien.Kong@ensimag.imag.fr> writes:
> +test_expect_success 'status when conflicts unresolved' ' > + git init --shared --bare conflict_test.git && > + git clone conflict_test.git test1 && > + git clone conflict_test.git test2 &&
I already asked off-list, but why do you need 3 repositories here. Wouldn't it be simpler to have 2 branches and test conflicts with "git merge"?
-- Matthieu Moy http://www-verimag.imag.fr/~moy/