Re: [PATCHv4 3/3] Advices about 'git rm' during conflicts (unmerged paths) more relevant
- From
- konglu@minatec.inpg.fr <konglu@minatec.inpg.fr>
- Date
- May 31, 2012, 07:59 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20120531095914.Horde.McdhLnwdC4BPxyTSG9v3ctA@webmail.minatec.grenoble-inp.fr>
- In-Reply-To
- <vpq7gvsrfr0.fsf@bauges.imag.fr>
Matthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy@grenoble-inp.fr> a écrit :
Show 9 quoted lines
>> Subject: Re: [PATCHv4 3/3] Advices about 'git rm' during conflicts >> (unmerged paths) more relevant > > "more relevant" doesn't say much, and your subject line doesn't say it's > about "status". What about > > status: don't suggest "git rm" if not appropriate > > ?
In the case of only 'both deleted', what we don't want 'git status' to suggest is "git add". Maybe something like
status: advices appropriated during conflicts or status: don't suggest "git rm" or "git add" if not appropriate
would fit.