Re: [PATCHv2 1/2] wt-status: better advices for git status
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- May 30, 2012, 04:27 UTC
- Message-ID
- <7vbol61efv.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <vpqwr3whjkp.fsf@bauges.imag.fr>
Matthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy@grenoble-inp.fr> writes:
Show 7 quoted lines
> Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> writes: > >> These are not independent (you cannot be in bisect and am at the >> same time). > > You should not, but it seems you can. At least, I just successfully > started a "git am" during a "git bisect".
Yeah, that actually is a sensible thing to support (and I am happy to hear it still works).
Show 5 quoted lines
> The variable naming is wrong (it could be s/conflicts/unmerged_present/ > and s/unmerged_state/merge_in_progress/ for example). But these two > variables are indeed independant. You can have unmerged path without an > actual merge in progress (conflicts during "git am"), an you can have a > merge in progress without conflicts (if you've just "git add"-ed them).