[PATCH v2] tests: use test_path_is_missing instead of '! test -f'
- From
Jayesh Daga via GitGitGadget <gitgitgadget@gmail.com>
- Date
- Apr 2, 2026, 16:36 UTC
- Message-ID
- <pull.2248.v2.git.git.1775147789459.gitgitgadget@gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <pull.2248.git.git.1774187447563.gitgitgadget@gmail.com>
From: jayesh0104 <jayeshdaga99@gmail.com>
Using plain "test" commands in a sequence of checks chained with `&&` makes it difficult to determine which step failed, as "test" silently succeeds or fails.
In this case, we expect that `.git/refs/heads/f` no longer exists. Replacing `! test -f` with `test_path_is_missing` preserves the expected behavior when the file is absent, but provides a clearer diagnostic when it unexpectedly exists, making test failures easier to debug.
Signed-off-by: Jayesh Daga [jayeshdaga99@gmail.com]
---
[GSoC] :pack-refs-tests: fix helper usage
High-level (Intent & Context)
=============================
The test script t/pack-refs-tests.sh has two issues that prevent it from
running correctly.
It uses: ! test -f .git/refs/heads/f
This is inconsistent with the Git test framework, where helper functions
such as test_path_is_missing should be used instead of raw test checks.
Low-level (Implementation & Justification)
==========================================
Without sourcing test-lib.sh, the test framework is not initialized,
leading to errors such as: test_expect_success: not found
Replaced raw file check with the appropriate helper:
- ! test -f .git/refs/heads/f
+ test_path_is_missing .git/refs/heads/f
Summary
=======
Replace test -f with test_path_is_missingPublished-As: https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git/releases/tag/pr-git-2248%2Fjayesh0104%2Ffix-pack-refs-test-v2 Fetch-It-Via: git fetch https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git pr-git-2248/jayesh0104/fix-pack-refs-test-v2 Pull-Request: https://github.com/git/git/pull/2248
Range-diff vs v1:
1: b6b9d11ed8 ! 1: 82c31d9257 t/pack-refs-tests: drop '-f' from test_path_is_missing
@@ Metadata
Author: jayesh0104 <jayeshdaga99@gmail.com>
## Commit message ##
- t/pack-refs-tests: drop '-f' from test_path_is_missing
+ tests: use test_path_is_missing instead of '! test -f'
- test_path_is_missing expects exactly one argument: the path to
- check for absence. Passing '-f' is incorrect and results in
- "bug in the test script: 1 param" during test execution.
+ Using plain "test" commands in a sequence of checks chained
+ with `&&` makes it difficult to determine which step failed,
+ as "test" silently succeeds or fails.
- The '-f' flag appears to have been carried over from the
- equivalent 'test -f' usage, but test_path_is_missing does not
- accept such flags.
+ In this case, we expect that `.git/refs/heads/f` no longer
+ exists. Replacing `! test -f` with `test_path_is_missing`
+ preserves the expected behavior when the file is absent,
+ but provides a clearer diagnostic when it unexpectedly
+ exists, making test failures easier to debug.
- Remove the extraneous '-f' to use the helper correctly and
- restore proper test behavior.
-
- Signed-off-by: Jayesh Daga <jayeshdaga99@gmail.com>
+ Signed-off-by: Jayesh Daga [jayeshdaga99@gmail.com]
## t/pack-refs-tests.sh ##
@@ t/pack-refs-tests.sh: test_expect_success 'see if a branch still exists after git ${pack_refs} --prunet/pack-refs-tests.sh | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/t/pack-refs-tests.sh b/t/pack-refs-tests.sh index 2fdaccb6c7..4a85d96c6b 100644 --- a/t/pack-refs-tests.sh +++ b/t/pack-refs-tests.sh @@ -61,7 +61,7 @@ test_expect_success 'see if a branch still exists after git ${pack_refs} --prune test_expect_success 'see if git ${pack_refs} --prune remove ref files' ' git branch f && git ${pack_refs} --all --prune && - ! test -f .git/refs/heads/f + test_path_is_missing .git/refs/heads/f ' test_expect_success 'see if git ${pack_refs} --prune removes empty dirs' ' base-commit: 6e8d538aab8fe4dd07ba9fb87b5c7edcfa5706ad
-- gitgitgadget