Re: [PATCH] t/README: clarify test_must_fail description
- From
Brandon Casey <casey@nrlssc.navy.mil>
- Date
- Jul 20, 2010, 18:19 UTC
- Message-ID
- <gSJqoMSCdnNZVG9-DiMIs9GCIi5KJ7c0V35BPIQOHLVdP1L6ZeO3iA@cipher.nrlssc.navy.mil>
- In-Reply-To
- <7veieym3sh.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
On 07/20/2010 01:00 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Show 7 quoted lines
> How about being more explicit? > > Run a git command and ensure it fails in a controlled way. Use > this instead of "! <git-command>". When git-command dies due to a > segfault, test_must_fail diagnoses it as an error; "! <git-command>" > treats it as just another expected failure. letting such a bug go > unnoticed.
Much better. If you want the last sentence to be grammatically correct, you could rephrase it like this:
...just another expected failure, which would let such a bug go unnoticed.
-brandon