Re: [PATCH 0/4] format-patch: fix an option coexistence bug and add new --resend option
- From
- Dragan Simic <dsimic@manjaro.org>
- Date
- Apr 17, 2024, 06:43 UTC
- Message-ID
- <b7568429acad91ff2d9a1574111441a3@manjaro.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <CAPig+cRzCSO_4r02Vc-OpH3Cyz0iTWv+q4oTRg30H5Qvzz=X7g@mail.gmail.com>
On 2024-04-17 08:23, Eric Sunshine wrote:
Show 22 quoted lines
> On Wed, Apr 17, 2024 at 2:07 AM Dragan Simic <dsimic@manjaro.org> > wrote: >> On 2024-04-17 08:02, Eric Sunshine wrote: >> > [*] For instance, my knee-jerk reaction is that we don't want to keep >> > piling on these special-case flags each time someone wants their new >> > favorite word as a lead-in to "PATCH". In addition to --rfc, and >> > --resend, the next person might want --rfd or --tbd, etc. More >> > palatable would be a general-purpose option which lets you specify the >> > prefix which appears in front of "PATCH", but even that can be argued >> > as unnecessary since we already have --subject-prefix. >> >> Makes sense, but in that case accepting the --rfc option, back at the >> time, was actually some kind of a mistake, if you agree. > > Possibly. It does happen that, in retrospect, some changes come to be > viewed as mistakes. On the other hand, if --rfc existed before > --subject-prefix was introduced, then --rfc would just be historic > accretion rather than a mistake. (I didn't check which option came > first.) > > At any rate, we probably want to be careful about piling on more > special-cases without considering general-purpose solutions.
Yes, but the usability should also be taken into consideration. IOW, perhaps typing just --rfc or --resend is rather quick and usable, instead of having to use a general-purpose solution and type much more, or instead of having to create an alias.