Re: StGIT: "stg new" vs "stg new --force"
- From
- Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@gmail.com>
- Date
- Jan 24, 2006, 21:23 UTC
- Message-ID
- <b0943d9e0601241323u3cf6fbfbk@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <1138126671.24415.28.camel@dv>
On 24/01/06, Pavel Roskin <proski@gnu.org> wrote:
> Seriously, it would be nice to have an editor that would allow to edit > the patch and see the resulting file and vice versa. Maybe emacs could > be hacked to do it.
I think emacs has some basic support via ediff-merge or smerge but it's difficult to integrate it with StGIT. Refreshing a patch with StGIT means updating the GIT index files with the latest changes in the working directory, save the index and create a commit object pointing to it.
-- Catalin