Re: StGIT: "stg new" vs "stg new --force"
- From
- Pavel Roskin <proski@gnu.org>
- Date
- Jan 24, 2006, 05:30 UTC
- Message-ID
- <1138080623.15105.51.camel@dv>
- In-Reply-To
- <20060120182255.GD32177@fieldses.org>
On Fri, 2006-01-20 at 13:22 -0500, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
Show 5 quoted lines
> I tend to use stg refresh -es as a quick (well, not quite as quick as > I'd like) way to look at the current patch. Often I leave it up while > I'm working (editing the patched files). So if exiting from stg refresh > -es suddenly started overwriting my working files, I'd be very > unhappy....
If I understand correctly, "stg refresh" only modifies the repository, not the files in the local directory. This shouldn't change.
It's only having two instances of "stg refresh -es" that would be a problem if conflicting edits are made in both editors. The answer to that is "don't do it".
-- Regards, Pavel Roskin