From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2006 21:23:05 GMT
Subject: Re: StGIT: "stg new" vs "stg new --force"
Message-ID: <b0943d9e0601241323u3cf6fbfbk@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <1138126671.24415.28.camel@dv>

On 24/01/06, Pavel Roskin <proski@gnu.org> wrote:
> Seriously, it would be nice to have an editor that would allow to edit
> the patch and see the resulting file and vice versa.  Maybe emacs could
> be hacked to do it.

I think emacs has some basic support via ediff-merge or smerge but
it's difficult to integrate it with StGIT. Refreshing a patch with
StGIT means updating the GIT index files with the latest changes in
the working directory, save the index and create a commit object
pointing to it.

--
Catalin