Re: StGIT: "stg new" vs "stg new --force"
- From
- J. Bruce Fields <bfields@fieldses.org>
- Date
- Jan 20, 2006, 18:22 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20060120182255.GD32177@fieldses.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <1137738224.27911.26.camel@dv>
On Fri, Jan 20, 2006 at 01:23:44AM -0500, Pavel Roskin wrote:
Show 9 quoted lines
> On Thu, 2006-01-19 at 22:38 +0100, Yann Dirson wrote: > > That command could be "cat" to get the current "refresh" behaviour, or > > an editor wrapper acting on stdin/out, or a wrapper to filterdiff, or > > whatever clever filter one would want to use. > > > > Does it sound better ? > > Yes. The first step would be to fix "stg refresh --edit --showpatch" to > actually respect edits made to the patch.
I tend to use stg refresh -es as a quick (well, not quite as quick as I'd like) way to look at the current patch. Often I leave it up while I'm working (editing the patched files). So if exiting from stg refresh -es suddenly started overwriting my working files, I'd be very unhappy....
--b.