Re: StGIT: "stg new" vs "stg new --force"
- From
- Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@gmail.com>
- Date
- Jan 21, 2006, 18:24 UTC
- Message-ID
- <b0943d9e0601211024s76528ce8m@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <1137539762.12454.11.camel@dv>
On 17/01/06, Pavel Roskin <proski@gnu.org> wrote:
Show 6 quoted lines
> I think if would be better to improve "stg fold" to work on arbitrary > patches. This way, you prepare the patch in the editor (which would not > be harder than finding hunk numbers) and fold it into the patch of your > choice. stg should check that the stack remains valid, possibly doing > trivial adjustments to the higher patches. The current tree should not > be impacted.
Note that 'stg fold' uses git-apply-patch which doesn't take fuzzy patches (a feature I began to like actually). Modifying the patch in an editor might create some problems with applying.
-- Catalin