Re: hgmq vs. StGIT
- From
- Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@gmail.com>
- Date
- Nov 1, 2005, 21:22 UTC
- Message-ID
- <b0943d9e0511011322q56812522v@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <20051101175905.GC26847@watt.suse.com>
On 01/11/05, Chris Mason <mason@suse.com> wrote:
Show 6 quoted lines
> The three way merge is still possible even if someone hand edits the > patch. For a three way merge, you just need to know the parent revision > of the change you want to merge. parent can mean the revision in the > repository that precedes this patch (mq stores this information, just > not in the patch), or it can mean any revision where the patch applies > cleanly.
Yes, but what I meant is that someone may modify the patch in a way that it is no longer appliable to its parent or to any other revision in the tree. A this point, a three-way merge is no longer possible (but, well, if someone modifies the patches this way should be able to cope with the consequences).
> Both approaches (mq vs stgit) have advantages...you can get roughly the same > functionality either way.
Yes, you are right. The big difference is the underlying tool (hg or git).
-- Catalin