Re: git versus CVS (versus bk)

> On Mon, Oct 31, 2005 at 01:00:18PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>> Do you think anybody is that perfect?
>
> 	I was being slightly facetious.  Of course everyone makes
> mistakes and corrects them.  But if you _want_ the history, you have to
> take it.  Otherwise, you are required to throw away the history
> completely.  And that -- do you want the whole history or none of it --
> is the crux of my question.

> 	I could care less about preserving my public image.  I'm an
> idiot, I screw up all the time.  I only care that the tip of my tree is
> respectable.
> 	I've seen arguments from folks on both sides -- the intermediate
> history is important, warts and all, vs throw it all out for a clean
> public history.  It seems that you fall into the second camp.
> 	That's fine, but can we make that work model a first-class
> citizen?  Can we get a script that pulls one branch as a single,
> un-historied (sic) commit into the current branch?