Re: git versus CVS (versus bk)
- From
- Josef Weidendorfer <josef.weidendorfer@gmx.de>
- Date
- Nov 8, 2005, 10:50 UTC
- Message-ID
- <200511081150.10867.Josef.Weidendorfer@gmx.de>
- In-Reply-To
- <20051107225652.GW1431@pasky.or.cz>
On Monday 07 November 2005 23:56, Petr Baudis wrote:
Show 6 quoted lines
> Dear diary, on Tue, Nov 01, 2005 at 10:15:33AM CET, I got a letter > where Petr Baudis <pasky@suse.cz> told me that... > > That said, with a big warning, I would be willing to do something like > > cg-merge -s and cg-update -s (s as squash) > ... > FWIW, cg-merge -s and cg-update -s is supported now.
The -s option of git merge is about choosing a strategy. How can I choose the "recursive" strategy with cg-merge? Some consistency would be good here.
Josef