Re: git versus CVS (versus bk)
- From
Petr Baudis <pasky@suse.cz>
- Date
- Nov 8, 2005, 12:04 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20051108120426.GB1431@pasky.or.cz>
- In-Reply-To
- <200511081150.10867.Josef.Weidendorfer@gmx.de>
Dear diary, on Tue, Nov 08, 2005 at 11:50:10AM CET, I got a letter where Josef Weidendorfer <Josef.Weidendorfer@gmx.de> told me that...
Show 11 quoted lines
> On Monday 07 November 2005 23:56, Petr Baudis wrote: > > Dear diary, on Tue, Nov 01, 2005 at 10:15:33AM CET, I got a letter > > where Petr Baudis <pasky@suse.cz> told me that... > > > That said, with a big warning, I would be willing to do something like > > > cg-merge -s and cg-update -s (s as squash) > > ... > > FWIW, cg-merge -s and cg-update -s is supported now. > > The -s option of git merge is about choosing a strategy. > How can I choose the "recursive" strategy with cg-merge? > Some consistency would be good here.
Good point. You can't now, but you should be able to in the future. I renamed this from -s to --squash.
Thanks,
-- Petr "Pasky" Baudis Stuff: http://pasky.or.cz/ VI has two modes: the one in which it beeps and the one in which it doesn't.