Re: git versus CVS (versus bk)
- From
Petr Baudis <pasky@suse.cz>
- Date
- Nov 1, 2005, 09:17 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20051101091710.GC11618@pasky.or.cz>
- In-Reply-To
- <20051101012915.GR11488@ca-server1.us.oracle.com>
Dear diary, on Tue, Nov 01, 2005 at 02:29:15AM CET, I got a letter where Joel Becker <Joel.Becker@oracle.com> told me that...
Show 7 quoted lines
> On Tue, Nov 01, 2005 at 02:02:43PM +1300, Martin Langhoff wrote: > > I'm really surprised that Calalin hasn't chimed in. If you are into > > rewriting/merging/splitting your patches, StGIT is your friend. Check > > out: http://www.procode.org/stgit/ > > But I'm not. I don't want patches in the first place. I want > cg-pull but with a flattened history.
StGIT does not work with patches but with commits. You can manage the logical changes with StGIT and when it's time, just merge your StGIT-tracked branch with whatever else. "Patch" here is really just a different name for logical change / commit.
-- Petr "Pasky" Baudis Stuff: http://pasky.or.cz/ VI has two modes: the one in which it beeps and the one in which it doesn't.