Re: git versus CVS (versus bk)
- From
Martin Langhoff <martin.langhoff@gmail.com>
- Date
- Nov 1, 2005, 01:02 UTC
- Message-ID
- <46a038f90510311702wfb43281rf4464a02e8e3be2@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <20051101004255.GQ11488@ca-server1.us.oracle.com>
On 11/1/05, Joel Becker <Joel.Becker@oracle.com> wrote:
Show 8 quoted lines
> > is possible) offhand. Sometimes, when you want truly logical > > steps, you would end up needing intermediate steps that never > > existed in your true history (i.e. "in the hindsight, my > > development should have progressed in these steps.") > > Yes, I always do. But I'm not talking about that sort of large > feature add or whatever. I'm talking about merely doing something on a > small scale, but in a temporary repository.
I'm really surprised that Calalin hasn't chimed in. If you are into rewriting/merging/splitting your patches, StGIT is your friend. Check out: http://www.procode.org/stgit/
cheers,
martin