Re: What's cooking in git.git (topics)
- From
Nicolas Pitre <nico@cam.org>
- Date
- Nov 26, 2007, 04:29 UTC
- Message-ID
- <alpine.LFD.0.99999.0711252324360.9605@xanadu.home>
- In-Reply-To
- <20071126041521.GA21120@fieldses.org>
On Mon, 26 Nov 2007, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> I do find that trying to work on top of a constantly rebased branch is > annoying no matter how I do it. So I sometimes wonder if we shouldn't > instead be finding ways to avoid the practice.
I don't think it can't be avoided in many cases. Some stuff gets rebased because it has to be refined before it is merged in a more stable and more "official" repository. Working on top of a rebased branch could be much easier if there was a dedicated command to perform the local rebase of one's work after a fetch, just like the pull command does a merge after a fetch, at which point both work flows would be almost equivalent wrt ease of use.
Nicolas