Re: What's cooking in git.git (topics)

From: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Date: Nov 23, 2007, 10:30 UTC
Message-ID: <20071123103003.GB6754@sigill.intra.peff.net>
In-Reply-To: <7vve7tuz3a.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org>

On Fri, Nov 23, 2007 at 12:48:25AM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:

> * jk/send-pack (Tue Nov 20 06:18:01 2007 -0500) 29 commits
>  + send-pack: cluster ref status reporting

Did we decide that printing the "maybe you need to pull" hint is not worth doing?

Show 7 quoted lines

> * jk/rename (Tue Oct 30 00:24:42 2007 -0400) 3 commits
>  . handle renames using similarity engine
>  . introduce generic similarity library
>  . change hash table calling conventions
> 
> This was an attempt to use different strategy to speed up
> similarity computation, but does not work quite well as is.

This is still on my long-term todo list, but obviously needs quite a bit of cleanup. Eventually I will get around to it.

I wonder if it is worth dropping from 'pu'. It doesn't pass the tests, making it harder to play with other pu topics, and it is not being actively worked on or tested by anyone.

-Peff