Re: [PATCH 1/3] Better document the original repository layout.

> Michael Haggerty venit, vidit, dixit 04.12.2009 15:36:
> > Signed-off-by: Michael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu>
> > ---
> >  t/t3404-rebase-interactive.sh |    9 +++++----
> >  1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/t/t3404-rebase-interactive.sh b/t/t3404-rebase-interactive.sh
> > index 3a37793..073674f 100755
> > --- a/t/t3404-rebase-interactive.sh
> > +++ b/t/t3404-rebase-interactive.sh
> > @@ -16,13 +16,14 @@ set_fake_editor
> >  
> >  # set up two branches like this:
> >  #
> > -# A - B - C - D - E
> > +# A - B - C - D - E     (master)
> >  #   \
> > -#     F - G - H
> > +#     F - G - H         (branch1)
> >  #       \
> > -#         I
> > +#         I             (branch2)
> >  #
> > -# where B, D and G touch the same file.
> > +# where B, D and G touch the same file.  In addition, set tags at
> > +# points A, F, and I.
> >  
> >  test_expect_success 'setup' '
> >  	: > file1 &&
> 
> My first reaction to the subject was "Huh? What repository?". So I
> suggest something like
> 
> t3404: Better document the original repository layout
> 
> as a more descriptive subject.