Re: [PATCH 1/3] Better document the original repository layout.

From: Michael J Gruber <git@drmicha.warpmail.net>
Date: Dec 4, 2009, 14:52 UTC
Message-ID: <4B192210.908@drmicha.warpmail.net>
In-Reply-To: <91462ec5e4409e558ec5158b7dea33ebf0081d3e.1259934977.git.mhagger@alum.mit.edu>

Michael Haggerty venit, vidit, dixit 04.12.2009 15:36:

Show 28 quoted lines

> Signed-off-by: Michael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu>
> ---
>  t/t3404-rebase-interactive.sh |    9 +++++----
>  1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/t/t3404-rebase-interactive.sh b/t/t3404-rebase-interactive.sh
> index 3a37793..073674f 100755
> --- a/t/t3404-rebase-interactive.sh
> +++ b/t/t3404-rebase-interactive.sh
> @@ -16,13 +16,14 @@ set_fake_editor
>  
>  # set up two branches like this:
>  #
> -# A - B - C - D - E
> +# A - B - C - D - E     (master)
>  #   \
> -#     F - G - H
> +#     F - G - H         (branch1)
>  #       \
> -#         I
> +#         I             (branch2)
>  #
> -# where B, D and G touch the same file.
> +# where B, D and G touch the same file.  In addition, set tags at
> +# points A, F, and I.
>  
>  test_expect_success 'setup' '
>  	: > file1 &&

My first reaction to the subject was "Huh? What repository?". So I suggest something like

t3404: Better document the original repository layout

as a more descriptive subject.

Michael