Re: [PATCH v2 04/13] Teach rebase interactive the mark command
- From
Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
- Date
- Apr 22, 2008, 17:12 UTC
- Message-ID
- <alpine.DEB.1.00.0804221810180.4460@eeepc-johanness>
- In-Reply-To
- <7vy775ygjm.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org>
Hi,
On Tue, 22 Apr 2008, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Show 7 quoted lines
> Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> writes: > > > So I really hate the idea of introducing yet other marks when we already > > have unique identifiers: the (abbreviated) commit names. > > Didn't I give you an example why commit object names are _not_ unique > identifiers already?
By that reasoning, rebase -i cannot work anyway: it relies on the abbreviated identifiers, not on anything else, for the "pick" command.
> I also do not understand why you think 'mark' is ugly.
Is that not obvious? You _already_ have identifiers. And there you add other ones. Only because the original idea of the -p implementation was ignored.
Ciao, Dscho