Re: [PATCH v2 04/13] Teach rebase interactive the mark command
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- May 3, 2008, 17:09 UTC
- Message-ID
- <7vtzhfuxfd.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <alpine.DEB.1.00.0805031340550.30431@racer>
Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> writes:
Show 6 quoted lines
>> And I try to stress that while we are still in the drawing board phase, >> because it would be painful to change once we start with a language >> without enough expressiveness. > > Unfortunately, we are no longer in the drawing board phase, because the > offending code is already in 'next'.
What does that mean? "Now we are committed to it, so I will stop complaining and work within the overall design in a more constructive way"?
We have precedence of even reverting the whole series from 'next'. When there is a better design available, I think it is perfectly fine to improve what is in 'next' in a way that is not backward compatible with stuff that has not hit 'master'. That is what 'next' is for.