Re: [PATCH v2 02/13] Don't append default merge message to -m message
- From
- Jörg Sommer <joerg@alea.gnuu.de>
- Date
- Apr 21, 2008, 00:17 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20080421001726.GA13639@alea.gnuu.de>
- In-Reply-To
- <7v7iescvu7.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org>
Hello Junio,
Junio C Hamano schrieb am Sun 20. Apr, 09:52 (-0700):
Show 15 quoted lines
> Jörg Sommer <joerg@alea.gnuu.de> writes: > > > From: gitster@pobox.com (Junio C Hamano) > > Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2008 22:17:09 -0700 > > > > Signed-off-by: Jörg Sommer <joerg@alea.gnuu.de> > > I'd admit that this was taken from my "You could do this" patch, and I am > inclined to think that the users would probably want this behaviour of > dropping the default merge summary when giving their own message with -m, > but I am not absolutely convinced that doing this unconditionally is the > right thing to do (iow, some people might have relied on the current > behaviour). > > List, any objections?
What about a new option -M? But I doubt someone expects this behaviour because the manpage says:
The second syntax (<msg> HEAD <remote>) is supported for historical
reasons. Do not use it from the command line or in new scripts. It is
the same as git merge -m <msg> <remote>.
^^^^ ^^Currently, it's not the same, but someone might expect it.
Bye, Jörg.
--
Die Erde ist das einzigste Irrenhaus, das von seinen eigenen Insassen
verwaltet wird.
(U. Schmidt)