gerrit code review once more (was: Re: [PATCH v3 0/9] sequencer: do not record dropped commits as) rewritten

From: Oswald Buddenhagen <oswald.buddenhagen@gmx.de>
Date: Jul 20, 2026, 21:35 UTC
Message-ID: <al6UqtgUtZb3bqMi@ugly.lan>
In-Reply-To: <xmqqy0f5d25g.fsf@gitster.g>

On Mon, Jul 20, 2026 at 10:03:23AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:

Show 10 quoted lines

>Actually, reducing the signal to a single bit, 'did I or did I not
>see a +1 from them?', means Gerrit users see less 'spam' but must
>make decisions based on too little signal.  I do not know whether
>that is an advantage.
>
>With your email, we can at least discern that your comment is much
>closer to an 'Acked-by' than a 'Reviewed-by', and we can respect
>that distinction when judging whether there is sufficient consensus
>on the list to move the topic forward.
>

gerrit discerns from -2 to +2 (*), so that angle is covered (**). https://gerrit-review.googlesource.com/Documentation/config-labels.html#label_Code-Review

(*) actually however many levels the project chooses to configure, though things aren't as smooth when deviating from the defaults

(**) mostly - https://issues.gerritcodereview.com/issues/40000793