Re: [PATCH v2 03/10] sequencer: be more careful with external merge
- From
- Phillip Wood <phillip.wood123@gmail.com>
- Date
- Jul 15, 2026, 09:35 UTC
- Message-ID
- <58c488c1-139a-4b56-9f80-2492b081f659@gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <alTvtOc39bLR4ocx@ugly.lan>
Hi Oswald
On 13/07/2026 15:01, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
Show 6 quoted lines
> On Mon, Jul 13, 2026 at 02:17:20PM +0100, Phillip Wood wrote: >> If an external merge strategy cannot merge (for example because it >> would overwrite an untracked file) it exits with a non-zero exit >> code other than 1. This should be treated differently to a merge >> > s/to/from/, i think?
Both are valid - the internet tells be "different to" is more common it British English, whereas "different from" is more common in American English. I guess for an international audience "from" would be the better choice.
Show 25 quoted lines
>> with conflicts > >> which is signalled by an exit code of 1 >> > parenthesize, and add comma? > >> because as >> the merge failed >> > (maybe add comma? here it becomes muddy ...) > >> we need to reschedule the last pick. The caller >> expects us to return -1 in this case. Also reschedule without trying >> to merge if the commit message cannot be written >> > add comma? > >> as that prevents us >> from successfully picking the commit. > > i know that most commas (and parens (or em-dashes)) are optional in > english, but they _really_ help parsing complex sentences, because they > reduce the amount of "read-ahead" required. > i'm stopping at this commit, but subsequent ones could also use the > treatment. i trust that you don't actually need detailed suggestions.
I've added a few more commas to later commits, but concrete suggestions are always welcome.
Thanks
Phillip