Re: [PATCH 03/23] builtin/describe: fix memory leak with `--contains=`
- From
Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
- Date
- Jul 31, 2024, 10:42 UTC
- Message-ID
- <ZqoVDkOw5IEWv52m@tanuki>
- In-Reply-To
- <xmqqr0bagark.fsf@gitster.g>
On Tue, Jul 30, 2024 at 08:27:59AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Show 8 quoted lines
> Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im> writes: > [Footnote] > > * The fact that cmd_foo() is called is not a hygiene thing to do in > the first place, and in the longer term #leftoverbits we may need > to refactor the thing further, into a proper library-ish reusable > helper function that can be used to compute name_rev() any number > of times, plus cmd_name_rev() and this caller that call it.
Agreed. There have been several instances of this scattered across the codebase. The fix is quite ugly in my opinion, but it would be a bigger topic to refactor those cases properly, so I refrained from doing so as part of this series.
Patrick