Re: v1.5.4 plans
- From
Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
- Date
- Dec 11, 2007, 12:57 UTC
- Message-ID
- <Pine.LNX.4.64.2903301355300.27959@racer.site>
- In-Reply-To
- <alpine.LFD.0.99999.0712102249180.555@xanadu.home>
Hi,
On Mon, 10 Dec 2007, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
Show 16 quoted lines
> On Mon, 10 Dec 2007, Junio C Hamano wrote: > > > There are outstanding issues that need to be resolved: > > > > * We need to do something about "gc --aggressive". The documentation > > removal patch from Linus, if it ever materializes, would be better > > than nothing, but I have this nagging suspicion that the explosion is > > merely a bad interation between -A and -f option to the repack, which > > are not meant to be used together. > > Well, with the gcc repo, simply using 'git repack -a -f' with current > default window size does produce a 2.1GB pack, while changing the window > size to 100 (keeping default delta depth) produces a 400MB pack for me. > > So this is really a matter of not having a sufficiently large window for > some data sets.
So my dumb patch to simply default to window and depth 250 with aggressive was not _that_ dumb after all?
Ciao, Dscho