Re: best git practices, was Re: Git User's Survey 2007 unfinished summary continued

From: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Date: Oct 25, 2007, 12:58 UTC
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0710251239590.25221@racer.site>
In-Reply-To: <472070E5.4090303@op5.se>

Hi,

On Thu, 25 Oct 2007, Andreas Ericsson wrote:

Show 9 quoted lines

> Johannes Schindelin wrote:
> 
> > When you're done with a topic, why do you leave it around?  
> > Cluttering up your "git branch" output?
> 
> We have 91 repositories at work. Roughly 60 of those are in active use.
> The active repos are organized pretty much like the git repo with
> 'master', 'next' and 'maint'. We *do* work on all branches, but not
> every day, ofcourse. They're NOT topic branches.

I already explained in another mail (wasn't it even the one you replied to?) how this can be done more efficiently.

Ciao, Dscho

$ cat FOOTERMessages come from the public archive at lore.kernel.org/git, fetched every hour. The front page is chosen and written each morning by an AI editor and can be wrong; the threads themselves are the record. About and API. For agents: an MCP server at https://gitlist.dev/mcp, and any thread, story or person page as Markdown by adding .md to its URL (or sending Accept: text/markdown). Details in /llms.txt.