Re: Git User's Survey 2007 unfinished summary continued

From: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Date: Oct 20, 2007, 23:33 UTC
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0710210031130.25221@racer.site>
In-Reply-To: <8fe92b430710201606i47e85b24k17abd819bf0d353b@mail.gmail.com>

Hi,

On Sun, 21 Oct 2007, Jakub Narebski wrote:

Show 10 quoted lines

> On 10/20/07, Steffen Prohaska <prohaska@zib.de> wrote:
> 
> > Maybe we could group commands into more categories?
> >
> > plumbing: should be hidden from the 'normal' user. Porcelain
> >    should be sufficient for every standard task.
> 
> The problem is division between what is porcelain and what is plumbing. 
> Some commands are right on border (git-fsck, git-update-index, 
> git-rev-parse comes to mind).

Sorry, but my impression from the latest mails was that the commands are fine. What is lacking is a nice, _small_ collection of recommended workflows. And when we have agreed on such a set of workflows, we optimize the hell out of them. Only this time it is not performance, but user-friendliness.

Hmm?

Ciao, Dscho