Re: Git User's Survey 2007 unfinished summary continued

> On 10/22/07, Andreas Ericsson <ae@op5.se> wrote:
> [...]
>>>>>> On 10/20/07, Steffen Prohaska <prohaska@zib.de> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Maybe we could group commands into more categories?
> 
>> Similarly, it might be helpful to have help topics the gdb way, like
>> "git help patches". It's one of those things that people have come to
>> expect from a software tool, so perhaps we should humor them? Given gits
>> "every help topic is a man-page" idiom, this shouldn't require any real
>> technical effort.
>>
>> Such topics should probably include
>> merge/merges/merging - overview of various ways of putting two lines of
>> development back together
>> patch/patches - how to create, send and apply
>> tags/branches/refs - what they are, why they're good, link to merging
> 
> Very good idea. It is definitely something that can be worked on.
> 
> By the way, what do you think about "spying" version of git, specially
> marked release which gathers statistics of porcelain used, with
> frequency of its use, and git-sendstats command added in this release?
>