Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] worktree lock/unlock
- From
Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
- Date
- May 23, 2016, 04:51 UTC
- Message-ID
- <CAPig+cQVaMOKtbUCWdZqYDO8ZUZkVcSJH14S=2xrZiDVJ59Xdg@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <20160522104341.656-1-pclouds@gmail.com>
On Sun, May 22, 2016 at 6:43 AM, Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com> wrote:
> This should address all of Eric's comments (thanks!). An extra change
> I made is free_worktrees() at the end of {,un}lock_worktree() to avoid
> leaking. This series depends on nd/worktree-cleanup-post-head-protection.Thanks, this addresses all my comments from the previous round (aside from the suggestion to add a 'locked' field to 'struct worktree' and populate it automatically, which you elected to defer for the present).
I re-read the entire series and, aside from the typo in the documentation update of patch 4/5, everything looks fine, and the series is:
Reviewed-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>