Re: [PATCH 1/8] move worktree tests to t24*

From: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
Date: Dec 12, 2018, 13:26 UTC
Message-ID: <CAPig+cQ0pPiB01KOWsC7a3mHdJz6LtAJjtf8=MWF+34NFdVb1g@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20181211215019.GO4883@hank.intra.tgummerer.com>

On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 4:50 PM Thomas Gummerer <t.gummerer@gmail.com> wrote:

Show 12 quoted lines

> On 12/10, Duy Nguyen wrote:
> > On Sun, Dec 9, 2018 at 9:04 PM Thomas Gummerer <t.gummerer@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Move the worktree tests to t24* to adhere to that guideline. We're
> > > going to make use of the free'd up numbers in a subsequent commit.
> >
> > Heh.. I did the same thing (in my unsent switch-branch/restore-files
> > series) and even used the same 24xx range :D You probably want to move
> > t2028 and t2029 too (not sure if they have landed on 'master')
>
> [...] good to know someone
> thought the same way.  I started this work before t2028 and t2029
> landed on master, so I failed to notice them.

The thought of renumbering the test script came up as early as 2015-06-30. See the last bullet point of [1], for instance.

[1]: https://public-inbox.org/git/1435640202-95945-1-git-send-email-sunshine@sunshineco.com/