Re: [PATCH 3/7] trace: use warning() for printing trace errors

> Jeff King <peff@peff.net> writes:
>
>> I wondered if that would then let us drop set_warn_routine(), but it
>> looks like there are other warning() calls it cares about. So that would
>> invalidate the last paragraph here, though I still think converting the
>> trace errors to warning() is a reasonable thing to do.
>
> Yes.  That is why tonight's pushout will have this series in 'jch'
> (that is a point on a linear history between 'master' and 'pu') and
> tentatively ejects cc/apply-am topic out of 'pu', expecting it to be
> rerolled.