[PATCH 0/7] minor trace fixes and cosmetic improvements
- From
Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
- Date
- Aug 3, 2016, 22:56 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20160803225600.fgm23bdacunmrw44@sigill.intra.peff.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <20160803213920.jg3eshy57bsldqjh@sigill.intra.peff.net>
On Wed, Aug 03, 2016 at 05:39:20PM -0400, Jeff King wrote:
Show 7 quoted lines
> Thinking about (2), I'd go so far as to say that the trace actually
> should just be using:
>
> if (write_in_full(...) < 0)
> warning("unable to write trace to ...: %s", strerror(errno));
>
> and we should get rid of write_or_whine_pipe entirely.I started to write a patch to do that, but it turns out the trace code is full of bugs (and opportunities for cosmetic improvements).
Here's what I came up with.
[1/7]: trace: handle NULL argument in trace_disable() [2/7]: trace: stop using write_or_whine_pipe() [3/7]: trace: use warning() for printing trace errors [4/7]: trace: cosmetic fixes for error messages [5/7]: trace: correct variable name in write() error message [6/7]: trace: disable key after write error [7/7]: write_or_die: drop write_or_whine_pipe()
-Peff