Re: [PATCH v4 10/45] sequencer: trivial fix
- From
Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
- Date
- Jun 9, 2013, 18:21 UTC
- Message-ID
- <CAMP44s2MrV+dFk+vv-NXyWAd0_M+Nb+SaHANNmv-hatWF1mYEg@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <20130609175353.GC2091@goldbirke>
On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 12:53 PM, SZEDER Gábor <szeder@ira.uka.de> wrote:
Show 21 quoted lines
> On Sun, Jun 09, 2013 at 12:47:16PM -0500, Felipe Contreras wrote: >> On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 12:33 PM, SZEDER Gábor <szeder@ira.uka.de> wrote: >> > On Sun, Jun 09, 2013 at 12:23:01PM -0500, Felipe Contreras wrote: >> >> On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 12:18 PM, SZEDER Gábor <szeder@ira.uka.de> wrote: >> >> > On Sun, Jun 09, 2013 at 11:40:22AM -0500, Felipe Contreras wrote: >> >> >> We should free objects before leaving. >> >> >> >> >> >> Signed-off-by: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com> >> >> > >> >> > A shortlog-friendlier subject could be: "sequencer: free objects >> >> > before leaving". >> >> >> >> I already defended my rationale for this succinct commit message: >> >> >> >> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/225609/focus=225610 >> > >> > Your arguments were unconvincing. >> >> That's your opinion. > > And Duy's. And John's, too, apparently.
And it could the opinion of a thousand more people, it doesn't make it anything more than an opinion. To think anything else is to fall in argumentum ad populum.
-- Felipe Contreras