Re: [PATCH v4 45/45] tests: update topology tests

From: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
Date: Jun 11, 2013, 04:41 UTC
Message-ID: <CAMP44s27ZRpUuEvt8DZyzqoB5AovEkM1HMPEi-kxpZg9STsU4g@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CANiSa6iFYgkgXJ9SdkiOJc-iwfCxfsoU+Nfs5hjhx45Am=kixw@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 11:37 PM, Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@gmail.com> wrote:

Show 25 quoted lines

> On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 9:40 AM, Felipe Contreras
> <felipe.contreras@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Signed-off-by: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
>> ---
>>  t/t3425-rebase-topology-merges.sh | 15 ++++++---------
>>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/t/t3425-rebase-topology-merges.sh b/t/t3425-rebase-topology-merges.sh
>> index 5400a05..96cc479 100755
>> --- a/t/t3425-rebase-topology-merges.sh
>> +++ b/t/t3425-rebase-topology-merges.sh
>> @@ -70,9 +70,8 @@ test_run_rebase () {
>>                 test_linear_range "\'"$expected"\'" d..
>>         "
>>  }
>> -#TODO: make order consistent across all flavors of rebase
>> -test_run_rebase success 'e n o' ''
>> -test_run_rebase success 'e n o' -m
>> +test_run_rebase success 'n o e' ''
>> +test_run_rebase success 'n o e' -m
>>  test_run_rebase success 'n o e' -i
>
> If you do end up re-sending the series on top of my series, I'd prefer
> to see the end result having the first argument inlined, so these few
> lines become simply:

Somebody else would need to do that, there's no point in me sending these patches, just to increase the number of my patches that get completely ignored by Junio.

-- 
Felipe Contreras