Re: [PATCH v4 10/45] sequencer: trivial fix
- From
SZEDER Gábor <szeder@ira.uka.de>
- Date
- Jun 9, 2013, 17:53 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20130609175353.GC2091@goldbirke>
- In-Reply-To
- <CAMP44s2YdG_pE7gnKfUJJP0SaO5pKu+kxPB=T74p14fuqXU9OQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Sun, Jun 09, 2013 at 12:47:16PM -0500, Felipe Contreras wrote:
Show 18 quoted lines
> On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 12:33 PM, SZEDER Gábor <szeder@ira.uka.de> wrote: > > On Sun, Jun 09, 2013 at 12:23:01PM -0500, Felipe Contreras wrote: > >> On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 12:18 PM, SZEDER Gábor <szeder@ira.uka.de> wrote: > >> > On Sun, Jun 09, 2013 at 11:40:22AM -0500, Felipe Contreras wrote: > >> >> We should free objects before leaving. > >> >> > >> >> Signed-off-by: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com> > >> > > >> > A shortlog-friendlier subject could be: "sequencer: free objects > >> > before leaving". > >> > >> I already defended my rationale for this succinct commit message: > >> > >> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/225609/focus=225610 > > > > Your arguments were unconvincing. > > That's your opinion.
And Duy's. And John's, too, apparently.
> The commit message I write and send is my decision.
It's always a pleasure to work with you.
Guess I should've known better.
Bye, Gábor