Re: [PATCH v4 10/45] sequencer: trivial fix
- From
Philip Oakley <philipoakley@iee.org>
- Date
- Jun 9, 2013, 21:09 UTC
- Message-ID
- <AD9D4E5DA7694BF297CDE2DA871CB3B6@PhilipOakley>
- In-Reply-To
- <CAMP44s3yhVbgkhtrSfHpk=VwcwMkb66ELA-xR0i6FCVGyRwHJw@mail.gmail.com>
From: "Felipe Contreras" <felipe.contreras@gmail.com> Sent: Sunday, June 09, 2013 6:23 PM
Show 16 quoted lines
> On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 12:18 PM, SZEDER Gábor <szeder@ira.uka.de> > wrote: >> On Sun, Jun 09, 2013 at 11:40:22AM -0500, Felipe Contreras wrote: >>> We should free objects before leaving. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com> >> >> A shortlog-friendlier subject could be: "sequencer: free objects >> before leaving". > > I already defended my rationale for this succinct commit message: > > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/225609/focus=225610 > > -- > Felipe Contreras
I think I'd prefer a mixture of both.
"sequencer: trivial fix: free objects before leaving". This gives the best of both worlds in that the 'triviality' is plainly there to see, and so is the type of triviality, just in case it has some un-noticed side effect that someone is looking for at a leter date
Same goes for "build: trivial cleanup: don't repeat prerequisites" [PATCH v4 03/45]
All the best,
Philip