Re: [PATCH v4 42/45] add tests for rebasing merged history
On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 12:32 PM, Thomas Rast <trast@inf.ethz.ch> wrote:
Show 22 quoted lines
> Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 12:25 PM, Thomas Rast <trast@inf.ethz.ch> wrote:
>>> Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com> writes:
>>>
>>>> +#TODO: make order consistent across all flavors of rebase
>>>> +test_run_rebase success 'd e n o' ''
>>>> +test_run_rebase success 'd e n o' -m
>>>> +test_run_rebase success 'd n o e' -i
>>>
>>> [45/45] would seem to imply that these tests fail as of this patch. Is
>>> that correct?
>>>
>>> If so, please either squash that change or move the test further up
>>> marked as 'failure'.
>>
>> I won't. The whole purpose of the last patch is to show these tests are fixed.
>>
>> Martin von Zweigbergk's patch series is independent of this one, I
>> merely added it to show the above.
>
> So you would deliberately break a bisection on this test file?
No, this patch series won't be applied.
--
Felipe Contreras