Re: [PATCH 1/9] remote-bzr: trivial cleanups
- From
Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
- Date
- Apr 25, 2013, 21:49 UTC
- Message-ID
- <CAMP44s296Fum_jKx51dhmmnz0jKkXG+P4XcE5xGen-euVUtYdg@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <7vwqrq1eco.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 4:37 PM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
Show 22 quoted lines
> Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com> writes: > >> On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 3:30 PM, Thomas Rast <trast@inf.ethz.ch> wrote: >>> Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com> writes: >>> >>>> But I do not care that much really. The patch is good either way, if >>>> you don't like it, you go ahead and fix it, because I won't. I have >>>> 174 remote-helper related patches in my queue, and nobody benefits >>>> from rambling about a one liner that is obviously correct, not you, >>>> not me, not the users, not the developers. >>> >>> You don't stick to the rules of this project, which have been pointed >>> out already: >> >> The rules of the contrib area are different from the ones of the rest >> of the project. > > Yes and no. > > A contrib/ material may not be held to the same high standard, but > that does not mean a contrib/ area maintainer has a blank check to > do anything there.
Nor did I claim I had one.
> It would be pretty obvious to people observing what happens in the > area after a while, if the quality standard the area maintainer > enforces is too out of whack, and at that point the area maintainer > deserves to be ridiculed ;-)
Of course, but the claim the rules are different still stands.
Show 7 quoted lines
>> And I don't recall Peff ever doing this "constructive >> fine-let's-do-the-work-for-him" on any contrib/remote-helpers stuff. > > I do not think Thomas was talking specific about contrib/ material > but your interaction in general with other developers. > > Cf. http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/220427/focus=220891
Yeah but how is that relevant in this context? We are talking about a particular patch of remote-bzr. And he immediately used that claim as ammunition to suggest the whole remote-helpers should be dropped. It does not follow.
Any suggestion to drop remote-helpers should use facts and arguments regarding remote-helpers.
-- Felipe Contreras