Re: [PATCH] git-send-email.perl: implement suggestions made by perlcritic
- From
Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@gmail.com>
- Date
- Mar 21, 2013, 16:51 UTC
- Message-ID
- <CALkWK0kkWAkiANL-vL-OthKSDkoU2b_Q68frkGc06QNG7RbSFQ@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <7vd2usbwkn.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
Junio C Hamano wrote:
Show 21 quoted lines
> Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> diff --git a/git-send-email.perl b/git-send-email.perl
>> index be809e5..e974b11 100755
>> --- a/git-send-email.perl
>> +++ b/git-send-email.perl
>> @@ -513,7 +513,7 @@ if (@alias_files and $aliasfiletype and defined $parse_alias{$aliasfiletype}) {
>> ($sender) = expand_aliases($sender) if defined $sender;
>>
>> # returns 1 if the conflict must be solved using it as a format-patch argument
>> -sub check_file_rev_conflict($) {
>> +sub check_file_rev_conflict {
>
> Have you verified that the callers of this sub are OK with this
> change? It used to force scalar context on its arguments but now it
> does not.
>
> I am not saying I know the callers will get broken. I am trying to
> make sure that this is *not* the result of blindly following
> perlcritic output without understanding the ramifications of the
> change.No Junio, I haven't blindly followed the perlcritic output. I've considered the ramifications, audited the callers, and run the tests to make sure that nothing breaks.
Show 8 quoted lines
>> @@ -1438,7 +1438,7 @@ sub recipients_cmd {
>>
>> my $sanitized_sender = sanitize_address($sender);
>> my @addresses = ();
>> - open my $fh, "$cmd \Q$file\E |"
>> + open my $fh, q{-|}, "$cmd \Q$file\E"
>
> Strange quoting (why not just say "-|"?) asideIntentional. I thought it was a pretty way to differentiate between a mode string (which can only be <, >, or -|) and a filename string. If you don't share my taste, feel free to use quotes instead.
Show 5 quoted lines
> , if you are moving > away from the two-param form of open(), it would be a sane thing to > do to also stop concatenating the arguments to commands to avoid > shell metacharacter gotcha. It will make the resulting code much > safer.
Yes, the file can be improved in many ways, but that is not the topic of this series. This series just makes the changes suggested by perlcritic gentle.