Re: [PATCH v13 5/8] bisect: introduce --no-checkout support into porcelain.
- From
Jon Seymour <jon.seymour@gmail.com>
- Date
- Aug 3, 2011, 12:46 UTC
- Message-ID
- <CAH3Anroaq+fH3T3_G1HsS3ecdNdpReaKLC5v=x37rDqSmtghww@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <201108030727.04246.chriscool@tuxfamily.org>
On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 3:27 PM, Christian Couder <chriscool@tuxfamily.org> wrote:
Show 9 quoted lines
> On Tuesday 02 August 2011 16:41:13 Jon Seymour wrote: >> On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 10:04 PM, Christian Couder >> >> If I was to do this, I'd prefer to change uses of $BISECT_MODE with a >> call to a function bisect_mode() that does the same thing. > > Yeah, I think it would be a good idea to have a bisect_mode() function. > I don't like very much to blindly call some code when we might not need it. >
Ok, I'll do that, though it does mean that during a bisect run invocation, for example, the file BISECT_MODE file will be read log(N) times instead of just once. Obviously, in the grand scheme of things this is not a huge cost.
I could use a variable to avoid hitting the file each time, but if I do that I am going to have to ensure it is blank to start with which means I will need at least an assignment in the place where that statement is now.
jon.