Re: [PATCH v13 5/8] bisect: introduce --no-checkout support into porcelain.
- From
Christian Couder <chriscool@tuxfamily.org>
- Date
- Aug 3, 2011, 19:41 UTC
- Message-ID
- <201108032141.10618.chriscool@tuxfamily.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <CAH3Anro1Hs5VBT9901PoDdhGjtzTEZHWd9hgHvjfB_ivSErHMw@mail.gmail.com>
On Wednesday 03 August 2011 17:13:13 Jon Seymour wrote:
Show 22 quoted lines
> On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 12:09 AM, Christian Couder > <christian.couder@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 3:24 PM, Jon Seymour <jon.seymour@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Mmmm. > >> > >> Actually, there is a neater way to do this. > >> > >> I'll such use the existence of BISECT_HEAD to inform the > >> implementation of bisect_mode(). > >> > >> This avoids the need for a separate .git/BISECT_MODE file. > > > > Yeah, but then you have to be careful of the fact that BISECT_HEAD > > might have not been properly deleted or might have been created by the > > user for other purposes. > > I have removed $GIT_DIR/BISECT_MODE in v15. > > If BISECT_HEAD was being used for other purposes, it is going to get > deleted anyway, irrespective of whether we have a separate BISECT_MODE > file, so I am not sure we need to consider that when deciding when we > need a separate BISECT_MODE file.
Yeah, I was probably worrying too much.
> FWIW: bisect_mode() was only going to get called from one place so I > just inlined the implementation in that place. (on the call to > bisect--helper).
Ok.
Thanks, Christian.