Re: [PATCH 1/3] t9350: point out that refs are not updated correctly
On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 12:48 AM, Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> wrote:
Show 9 quoted lines
> Sverre Rabbelier wrote:
>
>> I know there was a reason why using UNINTERESTING didn't work
>> (otherwise we could've used that to start with, instead of needing
>> Junio's whence solution). I think all refs ended up being marked as
>> UNINTERESTING or somesuch.
>
> True. Is it be possible to check UNINTERESTING in revs->cmdline
> before the walk?
That might work, maybe Dscho remembers why we did not go with that approach.
--
Cheers,
Sverre Rabbelier