Re: [PATCH 1/3] t9350: point out that refs are not updated correctly
- From
Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
- Date
- Oct 25, 2012, 07:18 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20121025071815.GA15790@elie.Belkin>
- In-Reply-To
- <CAMP44s2bNZLiyinu3wgmw4gaRM9XUvA857-8fOGebhKYFmDesw@mail.gmail.com>
Felipe Contreras wrote:
> Show me a single remote helper that manually stores SHA-1's and I > might believe you, but I doubt that, marks are too convenient.
Oh dear lord. Why are you arguing? Explain how coming to a consensus on this will help accomplish something useful, and then I can explain my point of view. In the meantime, this seems like a waste of time.
Let's agree to disagree.
Regards, Jonathan