From: Sverre Rabbelier <srabbelier@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2012 07:50:58 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] t9350: point out that refs are not updated correctly
Message-ID: <CAGdFq_ifDYKTXt_cKkz5ZTBPgZKB7HFEbWereNnhSmS3qbhbsA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20121025074829.GD15790@elie.Belkin>

On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 12:48 AM, Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> wrote:
> Sverre Rabbelier wrote:
>
>> I know there was a reason why using UNINTERESTING didn't work
>> (otherwise we could've used that to start with, instead of needing
>> Junio's whence solution). I think all refs ended up being marked as
>> UNINTERESTING or somesuch.
>
> True.  Is it be possible to check UNINTERESTING in revs->cmdline
> before the walk?

That might work, maybe Dscho remembers why we did not go with that approach.

-- 
Cheers,

Sverre Rabbelier