Re: [PATCH 1/3] t9350: point out that refs are not updated correctly
- From
Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
- Date
- Oct 25, 2012, 04:19 UTC
- Message-ID
- <CAMP44s2kjv9fHbruXv7NyVm9m+FjFnYDryuPZQ-RQXN9Nj6MAw@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <20121024191149.GA3120@elie.Belkin>
On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 9:11 PM, Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> wrote:
Show 8 quoted lines
> Felipe Contreras wrote: > >> Does it mean that? I don't think so, but let's assume that's the case. >> >> We don't have all those commits; without the marks we have nothing. Or >> what exactly do you mean by 'we'? > > Not everyone uses marks.
When you don't have marks you have to export *everything* that you are interested. If you want all the history from the root to master, then that's what you will get (and you specify 'master'), if you want only the commit pointed to master and nothing else that's what you will get (with 'master^..master'), but when you do 'master..master', you get nothing, because that's what you asked for.
Again, if you don't have marks, I don't see what you expect to be exported with 'master..master', even with marks, I don't see what you expect.
-- Felipe Contreras