Re: [PATCH 1/3] t9350: point out that refs are not updated correctly
- From
Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
- Date
- Oct 25, 2012, 07:48 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20121025074829.GD15790@elie.Belkin>
- In-Reply-To
- <CAGdFq_j5sWsHwJY-rWP-XJ6cMF6uwSq=9beFe9ZuZyixBa1fVA@mail.gmail.com>
Sverre Rabbelier wrote:
> I know there was a reason why using UNINTERESTING didn't work > (otherwise we could've used that to start with, instead of needing > Junio's whence solution). I think all refs ended up being marked as > UNINTERESTING or somesuch.
True. Is it be possible to check UNINTERESTING in revs->cmdline before the walk?